Home > Photos

Pixel Density on Digital Cameras

Friday, July 11th, 2008 | Photos |

sensorpixeldensity.jpg

Bill Creech compiled that chart and posted it over at Digital Photography Review forums.

Camera makers have been pushing more and more megapixels onto their cameras. That’s because camera buyers - confused by cameras in general and even more confused by digital cameras - have been conditioned to use megapixels as a measure of camera quality.

All things being equal, more megapixels don’t hurt. What the chart makes clear is that more and more pixels have been crammed onto the same size sensors. (The sensor is the chip that converts light into electronic signals.) As the pixel density increases the picture tends to get noisier. The noise is especially noticeable at higher ISOs. Cameras use high ISOs when less light is available, so the effect is most often seen with pictures taken indoors or at night.

A better measure of quality is sensor size. More expensive cameras have larger sensors. In the chart above the cameras marked DX and FX under sensor size are Nikon’s DSLRs. The FX sensor is the same size as a piece of 35mm film. Note that Nikon’s recently-introduced, top-of-the line D3 and D700 have the largest sensors and lowest pixel density in Nikon’s lineup. They can also achieve the highest ISOs - up to 6400 on the D700, with a “boosted” value (whatever that means) of 25600.

The non-DX and FX sensors in the chart are less expensive point and shoot camera sensors about the size of your pinky nail.

See also:
- The Megapixel Myth (KenRockwell.com)

3 Comments to Pixel Density on Digital Cameras

Swanky
July 11, 2008

When I was in the market for a camera I picked the older version G6 over the G7 by Canon. The G7 had around 10 M/pixels and the G6 only about 6. Yet, the image quality was better on the G6 for this very reason. Confused me too.

Tam
July 12, 2008

I was somehow unsurprised to see my Coolpix 990 as far up the chart as it was, considering its previous owner. :D

[...] other things I’ve read that seems right. I’m still using a 6 MP camera with wonderfully low pixel density. My main interest in a newer camera like the Nikon D90 would be for better high ISO performance and [...]

Leave a comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Search

A Word from Our Sponsors



blog advertising is good for you

Subscribe


RSS Posts Feed
RSS Comment Feed

Subscribe in Bloglines
Powered by FeedBurner
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My AOL
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe in Rojo


Email delivery of new posts:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives by Date