Home > Photos
Pixel Density on Digital Cameras
Friday, July 11th, 2008 | Photos |
![]()
Bill Creech compiled that chart and posted it over at Digital Photography Review forums.
Camera makers have been pushing more and more megapixels onto their cameras. That’s because camera buyers - confused by cameras in general and even more confused by digital cameras - have been conditioned to use megapixels as a measure of camera quality.
All things being equal, more megapixels don’t hurt. What the chart makes clear is that more and more pixels have been crammed onto the same size sensors. (The sensor is the chip that converts light into electronic signals.) As the pixel density increases the picture tends to get noisier. The noise is especially noticeable at higher ISOs. Cameras use high ISOs when less light is available, so the effect is most often seen with pictures taken indoors or at night.
A better measure of quality is sensor size. More expensive cameras have larger sensors. In the chart above the cameras marked DX and FX under sensor size are Nikon’s DSLRs. The FX sensor is the same size as a piece of 35mm film. Note that Nikon’s recently-introduced, top-of-the line D3 and D700 have the largest sensors and lowest pixel density in Nikon’s lineup. They can also achieve the highest ISOs - up to 6400 on the D700, with a “boosted” value (whatever that means) of 25600.
The non-DX and FX sensors in the chart are less expensive point and shoot camera sensors about the size of your pinky nail.
See also:
- The Megapixel Myth (KenRockwell.com)
3 Comments to Pixel Density on Digital Cameras
When I was in the market for a camera I picked the older version G6 over the G7 by Canon. The G7 had around 10 M/pixels and the G6 only about 6. Yet, the image quality was better on the G6 for this very reason. Confused me too.
I was somehow unsurprised to see my Coolpix 990 as far up the chart as it was, considering its previous owner.
March 18, 2009
[...] other things I’ve read that seems right. I’m still using a 6 MP camera with wonderfully low pixel density. My main interest in a newer camera like the Nikon D90 would be for better high ISO performance and [...]
Leave a comment
Search
A Word from Our Sponsors
Latest Comments
- Follow-up with pics: converting raw speaker wires to banana plugs (1 comments)
- Shannon Love on Problems with Peer-reviewed Science (2 comments)
- Apple insanely great device is an overpriced iPod Touch (5 comments)
- OK, but who hasn’t wanted to break Jim Treacher’s knees? (1 comments)
- Infrared Photography Links (4 comments)
- I saw the “G.I. Joe” movie (3 comments)
Subscribe
Archives by Date
Archives by Category
- A&E
- Best Of
- Blogging
- Comic Books
- Dancing Baloney
- Dear Lazyweb
- E-commerce
- East Tennessee
- Economics
- Environment
- European Union
- Family Tree - Jones Side
- Family Tree - Moore Side
- Food & Drink
- Funny Ha-Ha
- Guns
- Health Care
- Holidays
- Home Life
- Johnia Berry
- Macular Degeneration
- Media Behaving Badly
- Middle East
- Misc
- Municipal Wi-Fi
- News
- Nifty
- Photos
- Political Survival Kit
- Politics
- Polls
- Population
- PSAs
- Quotes
- Rocky Top Brigade
- Science
- Social Security
- Star Wars
- Tech
- The Usual Suspects
- Travel
- True Crime
- Word of the Day






July 11, 2008