Home > Misc
Stimulate with tax cuts, not spending
Tuesday, January 27th, 2009 | Misc |
U.S. News - 10 Reasons to Whack Obama’s Stimulus Plan
1) A 2005 study by Andrew Mountford and Harald Uhlig “analyzed three types of policy shocks: a deficit-financed spending increase, a balanced budget spending increase (financed with higher taxes) and a deficit-financed tax cut, in which revenues increase but government spending stays unchanged. We found that a deficit-spending shock stimulates the economy for the first 4 quarters but only weakly compared to that for a deficit-financed tax cut.” In other words, FDR vs. Clinton vs. Reagan, Reagan wins.
Previously
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Search
A Word from Our Sponsors
Latest Comments
- Shannon Love on Problems with Peer-reviewed Science (2 comments)
- Apple insanely great device is an overpriced iPod Touch (5 comments)
- OK, but who hasn’t wanted to break Jim Treacher’s knees? (1 comments)
- Infrared Photography Links (4 comments)
- I saw the “G.I. Joe” movie (3 comments)
- Eric Janszen gives the economic gloom and doom, take it or leave it (1 comments)
- George Dickel Cascade Hollow is good stuff (7 comments)
Subscribe
Archives by Date
Archives by Category
- A&E
- Best Of
- Blogging
- Comic Books
- Dancing Baloney
- Dear Lazyweb
- E-commerce
- East Tennessee
- Economics
- Environment
- European Union
- Family Tree - Jones Side
- Family Tree - Moore Side
- Food & Drink
- Funny Ha-Ha
- Guns
- Health Care
- Holidays
- Home Life
- Johnia Berry
- Macular Degeneration
- Media Behaving Badly
- Middle East
- Misc
- Municipal Wi-Fi
- News
- Nifty
- Photos
- Political Survival Kit
- Politics
- Polls
- Population
- PSAs
- Quotes
- Rocky Top Brigade
- Science
- Social Security
- Star Wars
- Tech
- The Usual Suspects
- Travel
- True Crime
- Word of the Day





