Home > Media Behaving Badly, Photos

Edgar Martins, photographer and bullshit artist

Friday, July 10th, 2009 | Media Behaving Badly, Photos |

Compare these two statements. First, le artiste:

Though my images are minimal in tone, they do not pare down my experience of place. In my work there is scope for so much more. What seem like highly controlled and manipulated photographs are but a product of illusion. The illusion of the photographic process. This is especially evident in “The Accidental Theorist” series. Most people assume that these image are manipulated. Or perhaps even staged. In reality, there is no post-production work, no darkroom or computer manipulation.
Edgar Martins

And then the guy who doesn’t believe him:

I call bullshit on this not being photoshopped. Check it out. I’ll eat my hat if this is not fakery.
unixrat

unixrat was right, his animated GIF proved it, and the New York Times has pulled Martins’ photos.You can still find them on the photographer’s Web site.

Now people are reviewing his other work. Despite his claims, Martins repeatedly mirrored and Photoshopped his images, both in the New York Times piece that led to his downfall and throughout his career.

Read the whole interview quoted above to see just how drunk on his artistic pretensions Martins is.

My work has an apparent formalism and aesthetic rigor that some define as being precise. However, the process by which the images are created is everything but precise. I photograph in often “unphotographable” conditions, whether in burning forest fires or the icy winters of Iceland. I also make use of long exposures. When you work in this way even the most natural of occurrences become difficult to quantify: light, time, focus, etc. For so long photography has been about control; I like to relinquish some of that control. This apparent contradiction, this dualism really interests me. I have always found photography to be a highly inadequate medium for communicating ideas—a subject and object of lack, if you like. However, it is this dissatisfaction with the medium that spurs me on to find a new visual language to work with, and, I suppose, a new vocabulary from which to derive my glossary of life.

Thing is, he has some good images. I wouldn’t care if they were Photoshopped if he hadn’t sworn up and down they weren’t, and if he weren’t so incredibly pretentious. You get the impression half of the guy’s cred was based on his patter rather than his portfolio.

Previously - YouTube, Meet Bullshit Artist. Bullshit Artist, Meet YouTube.

Tags:

3 Comments to Edgar Martins, photographer and bullshit artist

Hankk
July 10, 2009

(comment deleted)

Linoge
July 10, 2009

Wow. “Owned” does not even cover it.

I agree, though - those are pretty good photographs, even if they are ‘Shopped. But be honest about it, for Heaven’s sake.
Linoge´s last blog ..dichotomyMy ComLuv Profile

A Fan
July 24, 2009

God forbid a lesser known photographer than Martins would have gotten caught. He would have been ripped to shreds and shunned from the industry as untrustworthy and dishonest with no integrity. I find it amusing how light or non existent the critique of Martins has been. Obviously there are those out there that still wants his work and don’t want to step on his toes.

I think his statement above fits the trend of elaborate work statements backed up up by mediocre photography.

Leave a comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Search

A Word from Our Sponsors



blog advertising is good for you

Subscribe


RSS Posts Feed
RSS Comment Feed

Subscribe in Bloglines
Powered by FeedBurner
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My AOL
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe in Rojo


Email delivery of new posts:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives by Date