That’s one gem from this amazing, extensively-footnoted PDF.
The more you see of the data that was supposed to document warming the more pathetic it looks.
EDIT: Did I say “pathetic”? I apologize. I meant to say “fraudulent.”
Via Insty.
Partners
Latest Comments
- “To Animals, All People Are Nazis” (1 comments)
- Who Has Two Thumbs and Loves Their Fisher Space Pen? (5 comments)
- Word of the Day – Serial Comma or Oxford Comma (2 comments)
- 5 Most Wanted Guns (1 comments)
- Which AR-15 Collapsible Stock is the Toughest? (2 comments)
- One thing that really is true / This here’s a zoo and the keeper ain’t you / And I’m sick of you (2 comments)
- Local Restauranteur Stands up to Local Idiot Politician Stacey Campfield (18 comments)
- How Did Stainless Steel Appliances Get So Popular? (2 comments)
- Watchmen Prequels (2 comments)
- Too Much of Everything: Car Companies (1 comments)
Subscribe
Archives by Date
Tags
1911 amazon apple ar-15 bailout banks bbq beretta biofuels bullshit artists california china climategate conversations d40 deficit dslr video facebook fdic flash photography global warming glock gold google guns and cameras inflation investing jesus chrysler Lost million dollar ideas mortgage mess nikon nikon d7000 obama pensions porkulus preparedness remington ruger silver smith and wesson the fed unions wordpress youtubeAdmin
RSS Posts Feed
There have been times in modern history when new or emerging science has been used to support moral and political conclusions that in hindsight seem ludicrous or even tragic. Examples include social Darwinism and eugenics. I fear that global warming alarmists are on that path. They may “mean well” but their efforts may be judged by history to be misguided at best.
[rq=1676468,0,blog][/rq]Pre-Raphaelite Gallery
You know this is only tree ring data. and the author published his findings. If this is your smoking gun?
Try again.
Published or not the data is crap. There isn’t a single smoking gun to disprove AGW. Asking for one is like creationists asking for a single missing link between apes and man – it’s the preponderance of data, not just one piece.
As far as it being “only tree ring data” well what else ya got?