This is the old MovableType blog. To enter the new blog visit the home page.

August 30, 2004

News > RNC: Rudy Giuliani

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani was an important leader after 9/11, and even people who didn't like him before then gained a new respect for him.

That said, his speech tonight was poor. A transcript might produce a few quotable lines, but his performance didn't motivate me to hit TiVo's rewind button and transcribe anything. He came across as a bit too much of a bureaucrat to be important. Here's a guy whose speech had no central message and lots of little committee-designed bullet points.

Giuliani was at the locus of the 9/11 attacks. He had to have known some of the victims. He had to know the awesome responsibility of feeling the anguish of the people he was charged to protect. I didn't hear that anguish in his voice tonight.

SEPTEMBER 1 UPDATE: Someone disagreed with my assessment of Giuliani's speech, and that person's name is Everyone. Allah at least concedes that McCain's speech was better. I just watched Rudy's speech again on TiVo, and I still didn't find it very moving. It wasn't a bad speech, and he made a lot of good points, but he just didn't engage me. Others obviously felt very differently.

Here's the transcript and video of the speech.


Posted by lesjones



Comments

I listened to it over a radio at a fire station, The audience , being fireman, had quite a different impression.

I think Ron Silver was far more moving, but I dont think the men I watched it with tonight would feel the same way. Rudy reminded us all of what it means to be a citizen of democracy and not a subject of a government.

I will always remember where I was tonight and I will always remember what he said.

Posted by: Frank Martin at August 31, 2004

Interesting that you and the firemen heard it on the radio and liked it. That could have been a whole other experience. Like I said, someone reading the transcript may have extracted something different. I can't comment on someone else's subjective impressions. But watching it on TV, I thought it was very weak, particularly after McCain's rouser.

McCain's speech was measured and was frequently interrupted by applause. I wonder if Giuliani's more rapid-fire approach worked better on the radio?

Posted by: Les Jones at August 31, 2004

This is just good evidence why you line up a variety of speakers. The message may vary little, but each person brings their own style to the podium. I think it was Bill Kristol last night who said it was the strongest speech he'd ever heard at a convention - and then other panelists thought it as lackluster as our Les did.

McCain's speech was more in the line of a statesman. Giuliani's speech had his extroverted New Yorker imprimatur stamped on it with steel. A major focus was towards the significant minority of conservative Democrats, liberal Republicans and independents who form the swing vote. And the swing vote, estimated at only about 7% of voters, is critical in this election in the North East.

With tight margins in national elections every last vote you can squeeze out counts. A speech like Giuliani's is designed to inform a New York City construction worker and teamster that George Bush represents his interests better than the AFL/CIO.

Posted by: Chris Range at August 31, 2004

Dangit - typically I forgot the whole reason I was commenting.

I wanted to give the example of Lincoln's Gettysburg address. At the time it was given the newspapers panned it saying it was really boring, aweful etc. They praised the speech of the "other guy" whose name we don't remember. I'm even too lazy to Google the "other guy"'s name.

Nobody gave a Gettysburg address last night. My view is that given 1 speaker and an audience of 2, 3 speeches will be heard.

Posted by: Chris Range at August 31, 2004

I have to say that it was much more compelling over the radio than it was on TV. Ron Silver was by far the best speech of the evening. Short,direct and to the point. I was never more proud to see a liberal at a Republican convention. He was the walking example of the Lileks Doctrine of "We can debate the parameters of western civilization after we are sure it will survive" When will we see a conservative at the Democratic Convention? Where is the Democrats who once said "This country shall pay any price bear any burden in defense of liberty".

I did find the TV coverage more than annoying. MSNBC has decided that Ron Reagan is a commentator, I just want scream. At one point the panel was Dee Dee Myers, Joe Trippi, Ron Reagan and Ron Silver.

Bias? nahhhhhhhh.

I did get a kick out of Dee Dee talking about how the Republicans were "making her feel unpatriotic". Did the Republicans do that Dee Dee? , or a lifetime toking on the cheap dope that is liberalism. At one other point when the pundits were poo-pooing the idea that this was going to sell to middle America , Mike Barnicle chimed in to tell the panel that he was with a group at a queens restaurant and he said " dont kid yourselves, this was electric, I think your missing the story here"

Note to reporters - Get out of the office more often, you'll be surprised what you find out.

Posted by: Frank Martin at August 31, 2004

Comments on the old blog are closed.


Terms of Use