August 31, 2004

News > RNC: Arnold Schwarzenegger

Arnold gave a "coming to America" speech that I somehow didn't expect, and it was dead on.

When I was a boy, the Soviets occupied part of Austria. I saw their tanks in the streets. I saw communism with my own eyes. I remember the fear we had when we had to cross into the Soviet sector. Growing up, we were told, don't look the soldiers in the eye. Just look straight ahead. It was common belief that the Soviet soldiers could take a man out of his own car and ship him back to the Soviet Union as slave labor.

Now my family didn't have a car, but one day we were in my uncle's car. It was near dark as we came to the Soviet checkpoint. I was a little boy. I was not an action here back then. But I remember, I remember how scared I was that the soldiers would pull my father or my uncle out of the car and I would never see them again. My family and so many others lived in fear of the Soviet boot. Today the world no longer fears the Soviet Union, and it is because of the United States of America.

One of the things that unnerved my convictions in my unquestioning liberal days was talking to people in college who came to America from former Soviet states. For them, Reagan was a hero for standing up to the evils of Communism. That didn't square with my image of Reagan as a doddering old fool. (I used to be delighted that "Ronald Wilson Reagan" was an anagram of "insane anglo warlord.") But the people who lived under Communism saw the awful truth. When they had the choice, they voted with their feet and their lives.

In a few years, Iraqis immigrating to the U.S. will tell the same stories and sow the same seeds of doubt in another generation of liberal college students about their unquestioning beliefs about the rightness of letting homicidal dictators do as they please.

The rest of Arnold's immigrant story was amazingly powerful, and will have enormous appeal to the hyphenated Americans whose citizenship is by choice rather than by the accident of birth.

UPDATE SEPTEMBER 1: Matthew Yglesias is trying to nit-pick Arnold's speech, but his history is deficient, as Outside the Beltway explains.


Posted by lesjones



Comments

One of the things that unnerved my convictions in my unquestioning liberal days was talking to people in college who came to America from former Soviet states. For them, Reagan was a hero for standing up to the evils of Communism.

My mom came to America from a former Soviet state, and while she voted for Reagan 4 times and generally thinks he was a good president, she thinks his foreign policy truly sucked. Will you add that to your data set?

Posted by: Steve K. at September 01, 2004

Sure. I'm wondering what part of his foreign policy in particular she didn't like. East and West Germany re-united and abandoned Communism, the Soviet Union adopted Glasnost then eventually collapsed and lost its chokehold on its satellite states. What part of that isn't to like? But yeah, I'm curious about what policies she didn't like.

Posted by: Les Jones at September 01, 2004

Ok, I'm putting words into her mouth here, so of course take what I say with a grain of salt -- I obviously belive all the stuff below, too.

I think that she doesn't give Reagan much credit for bringing down the Soviet Union. She told me repeatedly in the 70s that the Soviets wouldn't last out the century because its economic system was totally unworkabe, and I think she belives that Reagan's huge defense spending didn't really do much to hasten what was already an collapsing house of cards, but only served to raise her taxes and muck up our economy. Furthermore, she is a big admirer of Gorbechev, and she thinks he's the one who was mostly responsible for the events of the late 80. One thing she does think Reagan did well was recognizing that Gorbechev truly was a different sort of leader, and working with him against the advice of many hawks in his administration. Unfortunately, in her estimation, Reagan's fellow travelers did everything possible to make sure that Gorby got pushed out, allowing the disaster that was Yeltzin to step up and ruin all of the progress that had been made.

She also absolutely hates war, having lived through one too many days of being attacked by bombs and strafing aircraft and everything else that comes with having your country invaded and being taken away by the invaders to work in their factories. Not to say that she's a pacifist, but she one of those curious people who thinks that war is truly the last resort to solving problems. Sending arms to Nicaragua, and supporting groups which roamed the countryside, dragging people out of their homes and burning them alive, may have served our national interest, but it certainly wasn't the last resort available to solving problems in Central America, and it really bothered her.

So, in sum, she loves commies and terrorists, and hates America, as is the case with everyone who says anything bad about W or the Iraq war. As the freepers would say, shes a Republican in Name Only.

Posted by: Steve K. at September 01, 2004

Oh, and I guess the other question would be, if she had a time machine would she go back and vote for Carter or Mondale instead of Reagan?

Posted by: Les Jones at September 01, 2004

If i were my mom, I'd probably smack me for using her as a rhetorical device, although I really don't think I'm mischaracterizing her views.

Anyway, no, I doubt she would have voted for Carter or Mondale. So what?

And I guess MY other question would be -- would talking to a very religious, economically and more or less socially conservative Ukrainian immigrant, survivor of WWII and two brutal totalitarian dictatorships, someone who had much of her family tortured and/or murdered by one of those dictatorships, who thinks that post-war American foreign policy has been corrupt, deeply flawed and has caused a vast amount of needless suffering and misery throughout the world, and who thinks that George W. Bush should be tried as a war criminal, unnerve your newfound hawkish convictions?

[p.s. -- believe it or not, while I'm the token lefty in the family, I'm waaaaay to the right of my parents on foreign policy, and the Iraq War in particular. I avoid the subject all together, lest my mother start crying and my Jimmy Duncan-admiring father quote one of the long passages from Noam Chomsky that he's committed to memory. The only thing that's worse to bring up than the war is John Edwards. Man, they hate Edwards with the fire of a thousand burning suns. Come to think of it, you and my mom would make a great blogging team -- you can cover the Cambodia stuff, and she'll thoroughly take care of the sleazy in it only for himself trial lawyers will be the ruin of this country angle.]

Posted by: Steve K. at September 01, 2004
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use