This is the old MovableType blog. To enter the new blog visit the home page.
September 14, 2004Media Behaving Badly > C BS. C BS Run. Run, C BS, Run (Part 4)
Two document experts hired to examine the documents before last Wednesday's broadcast warned CBS that the documents they were about to air were probably forgeries. Emily Will, a veteran document examiner from North Carolina, told ABC News she saw problems right away with the one document CBS hired her to check the weekend before the broadcast. Marcel Matley: signature expert or palm reader? In "Spirituality in Handwriting," Matley assesses a woman's "libidinal energy" based on her handwriting. In addition, in a 1995 California court deposition obtained by The Post, Matley acknowledged that he had no formal training in a document lab, in identification of papers, inks or "machines, typewriters, photocopies." He also acknowledged he'd had no training from the U.S. Secret Service, FBI, U.S. Army, California Department of Justice or any other law-enforcement body. How CBS's Mike Wallace got taken in by a phony Vietnam vet's story. For anyone hasn't seen it, Corante dissects Richard Katz's claims about ones and lowercase Ls. Comments Around the BlogsI'm beginning to think that showing the "old"/new memo comparison to some people is like showing a dinosaur fossil to a Creationist. The eyes see, but the mind will not receive. (If there are any Creationists reading this, I didn't mean you. Please don't blow up the abortion clinic I run.) The only thing that would have made that Dan Rather CYA piece more surreal is if he asked that guy, "So Bill, are you a forensic document expert?" No Dan, But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. Posted by lesjones Assume the Position linked with The Nth Ordinal Inconsistency Indicates Forgery Comments
"Maybe I'm an idiot, but I'm tending to give CBS the benefit of the doubt here. Faking the document with a word processor would seemingly be so totally obvious to any legitimate expert that I can't imagine the people they vetted this with wouldn't have waved all sorts of red flags and jumped up and down telling them that the memo could be bogus" Ok, I'm an idiot. Posted by: steve K. at September 15, 2004It's the final nail in the coffin, isn't it? Before, it was possible to believe that they were innocents who had been fooled. Now it just looks malicious. In retrospect, what's really hypocritical is Rather's statement on last Friday's broadcast. "If any definitive evidence to the contrary of our story is found, we will report it." The bastard: he had definitive evidence to the contrary before he even ran the story. Posted by: Les Jones at September 15, 2004Comments on the old blog are closed. |
Search
Sponsors
Archives
Every post A&E - (205) Best Of - (54) Blogging - (252) Comic Books - (30) Dancing Baloney - (26) Dear Lazyweb - (17) E-commerce - (159) East Tennessee - (283) Economics - (93) Environment - (71) European Union - (38) Everything's Illegal - (5) Family Tree - Moore Side - (6) Food & Drink - (77) Funny Ha-Ha - (164) Guns - (390) Health Care - (43) Home Life - (263) John Kerry - (1) Johnia Berry - (48) Macular Degeneration - (11) Media Behaving Badly - (56) Middle East - (47) Misc - (105) Mortgage Crisis - (3) Municipal Wi-Fi - (17) News - (304) Nifty - (97) Photos - (34) Political Survival Kit - (16) Politics - (60) Polls - (19) Population - (31) PSAs - (11) Quotes - (195) Rocky Top Brigade - (38) Science - (126) Scratch Pad - (5) Seventies - (3) Social Security - (9) Star Wars - (54) Tech - (111) The Usual Suspects - (15) Timothy Treadwell - (6) Travel - (60) True Crime - (69) Word of the Day - (98) |