October 04, 2005

News > New Factcheck.org Katrina Articles

Factcheck has two new articles, Is Bush to Blame for New Orleans Flooding?, and Katrina timeline. Frankly, I don't think they enhance Factcheck's reputation for non-partisanship, but judge for yourself.

The second article seems to have been objectively hastily researched. Factcheck has already issued two corrections. The article also states as fact that a wayward barge struck a levee, and is committed to the notion that Katrina caused the waters of Lake Ponchatrain to overtop the levees.

That's certainly been a theory. Jim Miller had been following it for some time. In a later post he finds the barge theory less credible. He notes that the three breaches occurred not in levees on Lake Ponchatrain but in floodwalls on canals. There's less likely to be barge traffic on canals than on the lake, and earthen levees and concrete floodwalls fail in very different ways.

This Washington Post article notes that "Katrina's surges did not come close to overtopping those barriers. That would make faulty design, inadequate construction or some combination of the two the likely cause of the breaching of the floodwalls along the 17th Street and London Avenue canals -- and the flooding of most of New Orleans."

Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

I've said it before and I'll say it again -- factcheck.org is more interested in communicating the appearance of unpartisan lack of bias by finding the middle ground of every issue and arguing that case, rather than taking an objective, rational look at the issue in question.

The result sometimes is comical, and stupid.

Posted by: Chris Wage at October 03, 2005

Chris: you may be on to something.

Posted by: Les Jones at October 04, 2005
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use