December 21, 2005

News > Germany's Attitudes Towards Terrorism and Crime

Last week Arnold Schwarzenegger refused to give clemency to quadruple murderer and gang founder Stanley "Tookie" Williams. Some people in Schwarzenegger's hometown of Graz, Austria proposed removing his name from the local stadium. (He has since asked that his name be removed.)

German politicians and European politicians in general are generally against the death penalty, though it still has popular support in many European countries. They presumably prefer life imprisonment for serious offenses. At the same time politicians in Germany were arguing that life sentences were sufficient punishment other German politicians released a terrorist serving a life sentence for murder.

A Hezbollah militant sentenced to life in Germany for murdering a U.S. Navy diver during the 1985 hijacking of a U.S. jetliner has been freed, officials said.

The German government denied on Tuesday the release was related to the freeing of a German hostage in Iraq.

Mohammed Ali Hamadi was released Thursday and allowed to return to his native Lebanon on the next day, after qualifying for parole after 19 years in prison, said Ulrich Hermanski, spokesman for the North Rhine Wesphalia state justice ministry.

This is exactly why many people don't trust the approach to terrorism advocated by European and American liberals. They want to treat terrorism as a law enforcement problem, yet their soft stance on punishment doesn't inspire confidence. American liberals in particular want to treat terrorism as a law enforcement problem and treat law enforcement as a social justice program.

Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

Can you elaborate on how you propose discerning between terrorism and crime?

Posted by: Chris Wage at December 21, 2005

Sure. An action against the United States that would constitute an act of war if committed by a nation is in my view terrorism. So for example 9/11, the bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut, and the attack on the U.S.S. Cole were all clear examples of terrorism.

Organizations such as Al Qaeda that commit those acts are terrorist groups. Any further action committed by that group - such as smaller bombings or assassinations - are therefore de facto terrorism.

Posted by: Les Jones at December 21, 2005

How does that not apply to any crime? I don't get it.

Posted by: Chris Wage at December 21, 2005

Well, if I go rob the Quik-E Mart, I'm not a member of Al Qaeda or any other terrorist group, so there wouldn't be any reason to think I'm a terrorist.

Mohammed Ali Hamadi, on the other hand, was a member of Hezbollah, a recognized terrorist group.

Posted by: Les Jones at December 21, 2005
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use