December 29, 2005

True Crime > Purported Upton Sinclair Letter Claims Sacco and Vanzetti Guilty

From LA Times via Megan McCardle"

The story was "Boston," Sinclair's 1920s novelized condemnation of the trial and execution of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, Italian immigrants accused of killing two men in the robbery of a Massachusetts shoe factory.

Prosecutors characterized the anarchists as ruthless killers who had used the money to bankroll antigovernment bombings and deserved to die. Sinclair thought the pair were innocent and being railroaded because of their political views.

Soon Sinclair would learn something that filled him with doubt. During his research for "Boston," Sinclair met with Fred Moore, the men's attorney, in a Denver motel room. Moore "sent me into a panic," Sinclair wrote in the typed letter that Hegness found at the auction a decade ago.

"Alone in a hotel room with Fred, I begged him to tell me the full truth," Sinclair wrote. " … He then told me that the men were guilty, and he told me in every detail how he had framed a set of alibis for them."

Here's a Crimelibrary.com article on Sacco and Vanzetti. The two were anarchists, and their cause was embraced by socialists of the era.

"My wife is absolutely certain that if I tell what I believe, I will be called a traitor to the movement and may not live to finish the book," Sinclair wrote Robert Minor, a confidant at the Socialist Daily Worker in New York, in 1927.

"Of course," he added, "the next big case may be a frame-up, and my telling the truth about the Sacco-Vanzetti case will make things harder for the victims."

He also worried that revealing what he had been told would cost him readers. "It is much better copy as a naïve defense of Sacco and Vanzetti because this is what all my foreign readers expect, and they are 90% of my public," he wrote to Minor.

Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

I knew he had done a book called The Jungle, but not one on the bombing. Will need to find a copy of it.

Posted by: Gunner at December 29, 2005

I read an account of the trial from a forensics point of view. BAsed on the ballistics, including two folow ups done years ago, there was no doubt that the gun found during the arrest was the one used during the robbery. They were guilty.

Posted by: rich at December 31, 2005

I didn't notice this in the news when it was revealed, until I read about it in Ann Coulter's book, Godless, pp. 51-54. Fascinating! As a US History teacher in a high school, this renders obsolete a whole page of the text we use--I wrote in this info in the margin and will teach the event differently from now on.

Posted by: Ann at July 21, 2006
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use