October 29, 2006

Environment > "The Massive Land Costs of U.S. Ethanol"

From the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Here's the introduction and here's the whole report in .pdf.

There are significant trade-offs, however, involved in the massive expansion of the production of corn and other crops for fuel. Chief among these would be a shift of major amounts of the world’s food supply to fuel use when significant elements of the human population remains ill-fed.

Even without ethanol, the world is facing a clash between food and forests. Food and feed demands on farmlands will more than double by 2050. Unfortunately, the American public does not yet understand the massive land requirements of U.S. corn ethanol nor the unique conditions that have allowed sugar cane ethanol to make a modest energy contribution in Brazil.

The United States might well have to clear an additional 50 million acres of forest—or more—to produce economically significant amounts of liquid transport fuels. Despite the legend of past U.S farm surpluses, the only large reservoir of underused cropland in America is about 30 million acres of land—too dry for corn—enrolled in the Conservation Reserve. Ethanol mandates may force the local loss of many wildlife species, and perhaps trigger some species extinctions. Soil erosion will increase radically as large quantities of low-quality land are put into fuel crops on steep slopes and in drought-prone regions.

And this:

"In the early 1980s, ethanol subsidies were used to prop up America’s struggling corn farmers. Unfortunately, the ‘trickle down’ effect of agricultural subsidies is clearly evident. Beef and dairy farmers, for example, have to pay a higher price for feed corn, which is then passed on in the form of higher prices for meat and milk. The average consumer ends up paying the cost of ethanol subsidies in the grocery store..."-John McCain

And this, via Instapundit, on Brazil's independence from foreign oil:

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio "Lula" da Silva didn't celebrate the oil independence milestone out in an Amazon sugar field. No, he smashed a champagne bottle on the spaceship-like deck of Brazil's vast P-50 oil rig in the Albacora Leste field in the deep blue Atlantic. Why? Brazil's oil independence had virtually nothing to do with its ethanol development. It came from drilling oil.
Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

I know he's a controversial figure, but there's something I remember reading in a Patrick Moore article years ago which I've thought of time and again recently. When I hear about ethanol, I recall this comparison. A forest is an ecology; a field sewn with one crop is a monoculture.

My opinion: Proceed with caution before you start chopping down trees to grow Plant X to make gas.

Mundane statement I guess. It's the negotiation of what comes after "Proceed with caution..." that will have people at one another's throats.

Posted by: Chris Range at October 30, 2006
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use