October 11, 2006

Guns > The Intangible Part of Shooting

Uncle, back from the Gunblogger Rendezvous in Reno, writes:

I had an epiphany of sorts in Reno. No matter what I do, how hard I try, or what I know: I just don’t like AKs. Period. Can’t help it.

I have a nice AK (see pics here) and I should like it. ... But I don’t. I don’t like how they feel. I don’t enjoy shooting them. It has nothing to do with them not being fine weapons. I guess, my dislike of it is more aesthetic/ergonomic in nature. I’ll probably unload it at the next gun show.

In comments, I told Uncle how he feels about AKs is how I feel about Glocks. I'll concede intellectually that Glocks are incredibly reliable and durable. They're also remarkably corrosion resistant, not unfairly priced, lightweight, available in a huge assortment of frame sizes and calibers, and have an embarrassment of aftermarket parts, accessories, and qualified gunsmiths who know how to work on them. Despite all that, and despite having shot eight or 10 different Glock models, I've never bought one because they just don't move me. The only one I feel like I shoot well with is the model 30.

The handguns I like - S&W revolvers, 1911s, CZs, SIGs - are guns with great triggers, sights, and ergonomics that keep me hitting the X ring. If a gun can't do that - and make me enjoy it - I won't buy it. Townsend Whelen captured it, in part, when he said, "Only accurate rifles are interesting." Only enjoyable guns are interesting, maybe. There's a reason the almost-century old Colt 1911 is still going strong - a gun with great pointability, great balance, and a great trigger is still a great gun, in any century.

This will be anathema to people who aren't part of the gun culture, but part of the appeal of shooting for some of us is pleasure. Shooting a well-designed, well-crafted gun and shooting it well is pleasurable. Some people will find that idea shocking. Others will nod knowingly.

Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

Amen Brother Les.

I feel the same way about Glocks. Just don't like 'em. Shot a buddy's model 19 (mid-sized 9mm, for those not up on the Glock number/model), absolutely HATED the trigger.

Shot his chronograph with it, too... :O

IMHO, there is nothing in the world as comfortable as a Smith & Wesson K-framed revolver. Put on a pair of Hogue rubber grips, it fits my hand like it was made to be there.

J-frames are great for concealing, but a might too small and light for +P .38s or .357 Magnum. N-frames are great for target shooting - if you're only going to shoot half a box of ammo or less. Any more than that and the anvil weighs heavy over time...

But the mid-sized frame... Give me a seven shot .357 Magnum with a 2.5" - 4" barrel and there is no situation in which I would feel undergunned...

Posted by: Jay G at October 11, 2006

I agree with you about Glocks. Like the idea, hate the ergos. The only one that fits me half-way decent is the 19. I may yet get one to use as a training gun for my students.

So far though, their mainly exposed to the guns *I* like. CZ's, Sigs, Browning High Powers and S&W K-Frame revolvers.

They keep asking for a Glock to try though. Philistines.

Posted by: Trebor at October 12, 2006

I guess it just depends on your hand shape or something. First Glock I picked up was a Model 20, and I bought it on the spot. It fits my hand perfectly.

Posted by: Mel at October 12, 2006
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use