August 21, 2007

Health Care > Waiting for Cancer Treatment in Scotland

The (UK) Daily Record:

CANCER patients are still waiting up to seven months for treatment.

Patients are supposed to be treated within 62 days of urgent referral.

But figures out yesterday showed only three areas in Scotland were meeting those targets every time.

In the worst cases, sufferers were kept hanging on for 220 days.

The figures, for the first three months of the year, show 85.4 per cent of patients across Scotland were seen within 62 days.

The target set two years ago is 95 per cent.

And that 62 day goal is for urgent referrals. If you can't regulate demand through prices, you have to regulate demand through rationing or waiting lists.

Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

What is the waiting period for someone with cancer in a country that regulates demand by price? Let's say, for example, someone who develops cancer, gets treatment, goes into remission, loses their job because of the rise in insurance premiums, loses insurance coverage and becomes uninsurable, then has their cancer return. Is the waiting period however long it takes them to raise the tens of thousands of dollars for treatment?

Posted by: persimmon at August 21, 2007

Hard to say, but U.S. cancer survival rates kick everyone's ass! USA! USA!

Posted by: Les Jones at August 22, 2007

As soon as the cancer becomes 'life-threatening', persimmon? However long the line in the ER is, usually less than eight hours. Needs work, but not bad compared to 62 days.

Posted by: gattsuru at August 25, 2007
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use