September 11, 2007

A&E > Britney's VMA Performance

After all the blogosphere talk I had to watch Britney's performance at the Video Music Awards. I didn't think there was anything wrong with her figure, so I don't understand the criticism there. If that's considered "fat" no wonder so many girls have distorted body images. If someone can't appreciate a grown woman's body maybe they need to join the other team or go out for seahorses or something.

But yeah, her performance was a disaster. She barely moved, much less danced. If she didn't want to sing she could have at least lip synced well. The sad thing is that half of the contestants on American Idol could have given a better performance. There are hundreds of kids ready to take her job and she's leaving the door wide open for them.

Posted by lesjones | TrackBack



Comments

I was thinking the same thing. If anything, I think she's quite a bit more attractive with a little meat on her bones. She looked downright emaciated before.

Posted by: Sailorcurt at September 11, 2007

Now is the time for her to start over as a country music star.

Side Note: On the right side of this page, I couldn't help but notice an advertisement for "Sugar Daddy Online Dating". That just wierds me out.

Posted by: Alcibiades McZombie at September 11, 2007

I completely agree. She doesn't look bad, but she's moves like she's old and arthritic. I don't think she deserved half as much criticism as she's gotten though.

Posted by: david at September 11, 2007

It's not that she's fat or anything, but she definitely is beyond the point of wearing an outfit like that. I can't believe the performance either, it's like she didn't know what was going on at all. And Sarah Silverman making jokes about her kids was wrong (she bombed worse than Britney) ! Vicous cunt.

Posted by: Jillian at September 12, 2007
Post a comment










Remember personal info?







Terms of Use