Les Jones

Clicking on the link I got "file not received".
Now that was definitely a waste of energy.

It worked earlier, but it stopped working. I've changed the URL and it seems to work.

Thanks Les, that did the trick.

This all assumes C02 is evil.

Simply because the Supreme Court, the UN and research teams funded by taxes levied under highly questionable scare tactics have deemed toxic the very gas we exhale doesn't make it so...especially when genuinely evil ulterior motives are afoot.

I live in Tennessee and got much worse on coal, real good on gas, better on oil, equal on nuclear, and higher on hydro. Not half bad.

Up here in the Pacific Northwest, we get 49% hydroelectric, which isn't surprising given all the dams we have here. After that, it's about 36& coal, 11& gas, and a smattering of other types. I'm actually kind of surprised that there's still that much coal here though...

C'mon all, the emmisions rate is the important item here, even tho' it's a function of the fuel mix.
Looking at emissions rates for major areas they are, from worst to best:
Louisville, TN
Washington D.C.
Seattle, WA
New York City, NY
All of California
BTW, Brian in the NW, when was the last hydro-electric dam project built? How many current ones have some enviro-whacko save the rivers group wanting to tear them down?
How many nuclear plants are operating? Nuclear makes NYC much cleaner than Seattle. No wonder you guys need coal!

So, where are the rest? No solar, no wind.